![]() ![]() Some video cameras will artificially create high frequencies from English is not my first language, and now it's even laaate here.) What sounds bad for you (after hours of editing and focus on the problems) might be perfectly acceptable for others (client?). The realistic goal you can reach here is better intellgbelity and perhaps a 'non offending' sound. ![]() Have others listen to your work now and then. Again an amazing feature, but the end result will depend on your persistence with the mouse. Amazing tool - but you will probably need to put some work into it regardless.įor static and sudden bursts switch to Spectral view of the waveform, and here you can use the Healing tool (looks like a band-aid) and paint over the bright dots that most likely are noise bursts. ![]() When you flip and remove the noise you can be more safe that it affects the voice less. Here again it can be valuable to work the opposite way you have a button 'keep only noise' and with this you can listen for a 'clean' noise, i.e. You take a representative noise sample (from where there's no voice - just a little snippet) and the filter will then attempt to remove this specter from your signal. The Noise Reduction is great at removing continuous noise. You will need to do this in separate and multiple passes - keep copies of the file! Then flip the curve so that the noise is removed. perhaps the opposite of what you'd expect. A method that SteveG has suggested in several instances is to use a (parametric) EQ with a high peak and quite narrow Q and manually sweep through the audio as it plays to find where there's the May in the future be possible, but they are going to require massive amounts of processing, because at the very least multiple tracking FFT systems will be required.ĮQ in the highs will round off the harshness. And because it can't be isolated, it can't be either treated or removed. But the same principle, when applied to something like reverb, simply won't work - because reverb is invariably decorrelated, and occurs all over the soundfield. Which means that something like a vocal, which is generally in a single fixed place, can be operated on with a reasonable degree of success (although anything else in that position will also be affected). In order to remove a component in this scenario, it has to be capable of isolation in an electrical sense - so for instance, with a stereo signal, it's not impossible to establish what portion of it is at any given position in the stereo field, and remove just what's at that position. The real issue is that in a system that by absolute necessity has to be automated (far too much variable data to be analysed by hand), the automated system has no real means of identifying what's wanted and what isn't - with a few relatively minor exceptions. Basically, it's mixed in with what's wanted - and like cakes, you can't exactly 'unbake' them after the event. Much data, and not all of it is removable by any means. Well that's true, but not by any means the only definition. It's almost a dead cert that this is what he's doing.>'Distortion' is actually missing data, and you can't bring forward something that simply isn't there. ![]() The chances are that your colleague isn't doing what he says at all - there are plenty of Karaoke track providers around who can create backing tracks that sound remarkably like the original, but they do this from scratch, not from vocal removal. And you have to be careful with it anyway, as it will also remove anything else that's in the centre - like the bass, for instance. The reverb is almost invariably spread wider than the mono voice, and will leave a ghostly presence of it, whatever you do. The Center Channel 'Eliminator' operates on a very narrow part of the stereo field, and if you widen it you start to lose a lot of original music. I think I am missing some additional step. I have a 'not so helpful' colleague of mine who brings out pure Karaoke and claims it to be from Adobe Audition 3.0 (a much older verison than what I am using). Is this true? But almost all songs have a bit of reverb on the vocals. I read in another forum that if the original song has slight reverb CCE may not work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |